<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rikcat Industries &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rikcatindustries.com/tag/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rikcatindustries.com</link>
	<description>The Portfolio of Rik Catlow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Human vs. Algorithm</title>
		<link>http://www.rikcatindustries.com/2007/08/02/human-vs-algorithm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rikcatindustries.com/2007/08/02/human-vs-algorithm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Catlow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rikcatindustries.com/2007/08/02/human-vs-algorithm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a web designer, I have to deal with SEO (Search Engine Optimization) a lot. (between you and me, a lot more then I would like to). My opinion on SEO is that it is 99% best practices, good marketing and good content. The other 1% percent is the gray area that takes up a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a web designer, I have to deal with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimisation" target="_blank">SEO</a> (Search Engine Optimization) a lot. (between you and me, a lot more then I would like to). My opinion on SEO is that it is 99% best practices, good marketing and good content. The other 1% percent is the gray area that takes up a larger percentage of my time. SEO is important, but it&#8217;s not some magic elixir that is the answer to all your site&#8217;s problems. I try to design for human users and not for Googlebot.<span id="more-16"></span></p>
<h3>Search is Broken</h3>
<p>If you&#8217;ve done a search at your favorite search engine, you&#8217;ve probably come across your share of search engine spam. It&#8217;s almost impossible to avoid, especially on certain searches. Recently I was looking up information about a rare medical condition on Google. It was impossible to find credible information via the search engine. Well, after fumbling through different keyword combos, I just went to <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a> and immediately found what I was looking for. </p>
<h3>Status Quo</h3>
<p>Where is Google&#8217;s innovation in search in the last 2 or 3 years? I know they plan on implementing what they call &#8220;universal search&#8221; by combining <a href="http://www.google.com/base" target="_blank">Google Base</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/news" target="_blank">Google News</a> and other properties in their search results. In my opinion, this is just going to add to the problem of spam. It may not be in Google&#8217;s best interest to fix the search spam problems because most of the spammers use Adsense to monetize there SEO spamming efforts.</p>
<p>Google should add refinement options to there results by <a href="http://dmoz.org/about.html" target="_blank">Open Directory Project</a> categories, page rank, publish date and related keywords. Having refinement options would do a lot to combat the problem of users trying to figure out the proper keyword combo that will get them relevant non-spammed results.</p>
<h3>Humans are Smarter</h3>
<p>Along the lines of my previous use of Wikipedia, I&#8217;m using <a href="http://del.icio.us/" target="_blank">del.icio.us</a> now to find stuff on general topics. The great thing about del.icio.us is that every url entry is human generated. Yahoo would be wise to leverage the collective wisdom of the del.icio.us users to help its own search engine. It has a huge opportunity to supplant the search algorithm with its own human-filtered results, and with the user-entered tags, create a great refinement system. </p>
<p>It seems that there will always be problems when companies build products that have no human intervention to discern meaning or intent. It&#8217;s a cat and mouse game, and the humans usually figure out a way to out-maneuver the algorithm.</p>
<p>What do think? Is search engine spam unstoppable, is there a better way, or do you think it&#8217;s not a problem at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rikcatindustries.com/2007/08/02/human-vs-algorithm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
